Thema drucken
04.04.2019 09:44
|
LOS ANGELES -- Aaron Parks scored 22 points, on 10-of-13 shooting, with eight rebounds and four assists, Tavrion Dawson tied a career best with 21 points and Cal State Northridge escaped with an 84-82 win over Northern Illinois on Saturday night.Kendall Smith added 15 points and a career-high eight assists and Rakim Lubin scored 10. Dawson made 6 of 8 from the field, including both of his 3-point attempts, and 7 of 7 foul shots.Dawson hit two free throws to give CSUN (2-2) an 83-78 lead with 18 seconds left, but Laytwan Porter missed a layup, grabbed the offensive rebound and then hit a 3 to pull the Huskies within two with 10 seconds remaining.Lubin and NIUs Levi Bradley each made 1 of 2 free throws to cap the scoring before Dontel Highsmith stole it from Lubin with 2 seconds left, but missed a potential winning 3-pointer at the buzzer.Porter scored 19, including three 3s, for the Huskies (3-1). Air Jordan 5 Canada . Halladay signed a one-day contract with the Toronto Blue Jays on Monday that allowed the veteran right-hander to retire as a member of team with which he broke into the majors and spent the bulk of his distinguished 16-year career. Cheap Jordan 5 Canada .C. -- Todd Fiddler scored a hat trick, including the overtime goal, as the Prince George Cougars survived an 8-7 win against the Kamloops Blazers in Western Hockey League play Sunday. http://www.cheapairjordan5canada.com/ . Emery skated the length of the ice and fought an unwilling Holtby during the third period of the Flyers 7-0 loss Friday night in Philadelphia. He was given 29 penalty minutes, including a game misconduct. But Emery did not face even a disciplinary hearing with NHL senior vice president of player safety Brendan Shanahan because rules 46. Cheapest Air Jordan 5 . - Blake Griffin had 30 points and 12 rebounds, J. Air Jordan 5 Retro Canada . At a Manhattan federal court hearing, attorney Jordan Siev said his law office has gotten more evidence nearly every day to support its lawsuit accusing MLB and Selig of going on a "witch hunt" to ruin Rodriguezs reputation and career. He said the defendants went "way over the line. The BCCI is set to file a review petition against the Supreme Courts verdict that approved most of the Lodha Committees recommendations. The decision to file the petition is based on the advice of former Supreme Court judge Markandey Katju, who was appointed to counsel the board on the verdict related to the implementation of the committees recommendations. It is also learnt BCCI president Anurag Thakur and secretary Ajay Shirke will not go through with their scheduled meeting with the Lodha Committee on Tuesday after Katju advised them against it.Our judicial review petition is pending. We will be going to file it [in the next two days]. Till the outcome is not there how can we go and attend the meeting? a top BCCI official told ESPNcricinfo. Justice Katju has clearly told us that you should go for the review petition. Members have also agreed [with his assessment]. We will look at the outcome of the review petition and take the necessary action. It is understood that with the parliamentary session in progress on Tuesday, Thakur, who is a Member of Parliament with the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party, will be unavailable to meet the Lodha Committee in any case. It is understood that Shirke wrote to the committee on Sunday night requesting that the meeting be deferred. The committee, however, declined the request.According to a legal expert, a review petition has to be filed within 30 days of the verdict, and it will be heard by the same bench of judges that passed the judgement, in this case Chief Justice of India TS Thakur.Review petitions are usually entertained when there is an error apparent. But here is a case where two judges have taken a very serious view of the matter; its not like they have passed a judgement after one hearing, the legal expert told ESPNcricinfo. The judges have taken a very specific view on the matter. The question of whether its wrong is not something the Supreme Court is going to go into. They are not going to re-examine those things.The expert said 99% of the petitions were dismissed in the chamber itself.dddddddddddd [Review petitions come into the picture in] cases where very serious legal errors are committed, which the court may not have been aware of, the expert said.Some fact, for example, which for some reason the court didnt consider which completely alters the nature of the judgement. Its just sort of a thing which parties file mostly to prolong the matter as opposed to actually getting any relief.The point of having a Supreme Court is to ensure matters come to a conclusion and some final judgement is arrived at. Now if they will file a review petition it will go before CJI Thakur and some other judge who will be assigned to the matter.The expert felt that should Thakur and Shirke not meet with the Lodha Committee it might lead to contempt proceedings. There is an argument that can be made that the committees findings essentially merge with the Supreme Courts judgement, he said. Therefore, if they fail to abide by an order of the court then that could amount to contempt of the court.I am pretty sure if they dont meet them tomorrow then someone will file a contempt petition or the Supreme Court itself can also suo moto, take it upon themselves and say you should have appeared, or the Lodha Committee might write to the Supreme Court and say they havent appeared.A Lodha Committee source also confirmed that contempt proceedings would be initiated should Thakur and Shirke not turn up for the meeting.The BCCI official, however, suggested the board couldnt afford to worry about consequences considering that they were fighting for survival. This is all we can do, what else can we do, he said. We also have our fundamental rights.Katju, who submitted an interim report to the BCCI on Sunday, had also termed the courts order unconstitutional and illegal and said it had violated principles of the Indian Constitution. ' ' ' |
|
Antworten
