MONZA, Italy -- Lewis Hamilton says Mercedes starts are his main concern before Singapore after losing a shot at victory at the Italian Grand Prix due to a poor getaway off the line.Hamiltons dominant weekend fell apart at lights out, with a slow start from pole position relegating him to seventh at the end of the first lap. Although he eventually battled back to finish second, the poor start cost him what had looked like a good shot at victory.The reigning world champion struggled to explain what went wrong immediately after the race, suggesting it was an inconsistent clutch, but was able to give a more accurate description in his evening media session, which came after his debrief.Im told it wasnt a driver error, but it wasnt anyones error, Hamilton said. Youve seen it with Nico in Hockenheim and its bitten me quite a lot this year. I was told the procedure was just as I was supposed to do it but unfortunately we had an over-delivery of torque and the wheels were just spinning from the get-go.Asked if further improvements need to be made, Hamilton said: Of course, we never stop improving and learning. Today we would have learnt again but this year has been a harder year for us with the clutch. Its not a quick fix, not something we can change for the next race. We have made improvements and have made more consistent starts but we are still caught out by the random variation that we have from one weekend to another.We do practice starts all weekend and they are varying a little bit and then, every now and then, we get a random variation on the grid. Youve seen it with Nico and youve seen it with me, quite a few times, so we will continue to work on it. I assure you that on Tuesday thats all we will be talking about because everything else we are doing really well. I will be trying to give as much information to help the last seven races. We are not struggling with pole positions, its just getting off the line.In his own media session, team boss Toto Wolff disagreed that driver error played no part in the start but refused to single out anyone for blame.The reason we changed the rules last year was to give more responsbility to the driver and make it more variable. But its just what happens, you have good starts and bad starts, and I think our system has improved a lot. But obviously today machine and driver got it wrong.What we can see is that it is a procedural thing so I dont want to blame anybody. Neither Lewis, nor the engineers, nor the systems. I think we have to properly address that topic because it cost him a race and I think we all need to stick the heads together to avoid that for him and the team.When it was put to Wolff that surely someone must have been to blame as something went wrong during the procedure, he replied: No, completely wrong. We are never blaming anybody. This team, I would never believe anyone is to blame, not the driver, not the engineer, nobody.When you start to blame this is when it goes downhill because people will try to protect their arse and make sure they have a conservative system in place rather than putting the best development on the car. So nobody is to blame. In this particular case I think its a combination of many things, partly because we changed rules last year and why I dont want to go there. Cheap Air Max 97 Nz Online . PETERSBURG, Fla. Cheap Air Max 97 Nz Shoes . -- Claudio Bieler hadnt scored since early September, and not from the run of play since mid-July. http://www.cheapairmax97nz.com/ . -- Ryan Getzlaf grabbed the three pucks wrapped in tape and held them up to his chest in the Anaheim Ducks dressing room for a celebration nine seasons in the making. Air Max 97 Nz Cheap . The Australian is competing in his final season in Formula One and still looking for his first win this year. He will look to end Vettels run of six straight race wins on Sunday. Webber, who is fifth in the championship, earned his second pole from the past three races and 13th of his career. Cheap Air Max 97 Nz Sale . -- Lou Brocks shoulder-to-shoulder collision with Bill Freehan during the 1968 World Series and Pete Roses bruising hit on Ray Fosse in the 1970 All-Star game could become relics of baseball history, like the dead-ball era. Outspoken New York Jets star Brandon Marshall, commenting for the first time on the Colin Kaepernick controversy, defended the quarterbacks right to sit in protest during the national anthem.This guy, hes one of the biggest patriots out there, Marshall said Tuesday in an interview on WFAN radio in New York. Because hes standing up for human rights.Marshall was a guest on the Boomer and Carton show. The Pro Bowl wide receiver sharply disagreed with co-host Boomer Esiason, who last week was critical of Kaepernick.Youre 100 percent wrong, Marshall told Esiason, his fellow analyst on Showtimes Inside the NFL.Never shy about tackling polarizing issues, Marshall said he will be standing for the anthem on Sunday at MetLife Stadium, where the Jets will commemorate the 15th anniversary of the 9/11 terror attacks with a pregame ceremony.Marshall said Kaepernicks action, aimed to protest police brutality against minorities, is a hot topic of conversation in locker rooms across the NFL, including the Jets.Several Jets players were reluctant to comment last week when approached by reporters.I think President Obama said it best: Thats his constitutional right, Marshall said of the San Francisco 49ers quarterback. But I do think this is very thought-provoking for all.I think that the message was a little dilutted because of how much respect a lot of us have for those that served.dddddddddddd? [They] gave us our freedoms, fought for our freedoms. But the message was clear.Marshall, who missed the last two games of the preseason with a minor hip injury, hasnt talked to reporters in nearly two weeks.The only thing that I would love for everyone to really think about is: What does the American flag mean to them? Marshall asked.When I look at the American flag, I see a bunch of fights. You know how much we have overcome. When you look at it, the American flag is bigger than just one thing. And you have the civil rights movement, you have sex trafficking, you have immigration law. Theres so many different fights there. And we have to be aware that its bigger than one person and one thing.But then there are times when that one thing trumps all. When it comes to human rights, we really have to be careful. If you believe in one thing, if you believe in mental health, that means you believe in cancer research. If you believe in cancer research, you believe in raising awareness for HIV. If you believe in standing up for gay rights, then you believe in standing up for the minorities. ' ' '